The U.S. Supreme Court handed down a verdict that the smokers will be able to obtain reimbursement from cigarette companies the use of cigarettes in the title the words "light". The court acknowledged that the manufacturer of misleading customers by creating the illusion that such cigarettes have less injury, said France PresseI can not remember when the first "light" cigarettes. About 10 years...
Honestly have mixed feelings about this because labeled 'light' or not, anyone who smokes must surely now – and even many, many years ago –
I have smoked for 50yrs and it's my choice,as I'm quite aware of the harm it's doing to my health.Can't see how they can call it light.You break the filter tip off and it's still the same strenght to me.I think it's the number of perferated holes in the paper,in so called light or mild cigarettes,as you can't get the same amount of Nicotine,at any one time. I could be wrong in my assumption.
I think you have hit the nail on the head DSTM, Having been a smoker about the only difference I can see is the amount of air versus the amount of smoke between light and non lightMara you did not offend anyone because your right about knowing, Common sense would tell a smoker thatI think it very unfortunate that the Supreme court has handed down this verdict simply because we ( U.S) have becomea nation of " Can't take responsibility for my actions so I will sue."Growing up we have all done things that have hurt us, but we learn from those mistakes and then don't do them againmaybe we all need to go back and re-learn those things again.Bear
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.