<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Top Advantages to owning a digital camera over an old SLR 35mm film camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tips4pc.com/articles/digital%20camera%20tips/10_top_advantages_to_owning_a_di.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tips4pc.com/articles/digital%20camera%20tips/10_top_advantages_to_owning_a_di.htm</link>
	<description>Computer Tips and Tricks from Tips4pc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 05:22:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ernesto</title>
		<link>http://tips4pc.com/articles/digital%20camera%20tips/10_top_advantages_to_owning_a_di.htm#comment-21897</link>
		<dc:creator>Ernesto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2011 19:38:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://growingtomatoestips.com/?p=1263#comment-21897</guid>
		<description>I totally disagree with point #2. Digital will NEVER have better quality than film. It takes a 22 mega pixel camera to achieve (almost) the same quality of a film negative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally disagree with point #2. Digital will NEVER have better quality than film. It takes a 22 mega pixel camera to achieve (almost) the same quality of a film negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

